🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents applauding your insights on growing your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

If not, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of women joined an organized professional network test recently following popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants rewrote their professional summaries to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system prioritizes male users who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which posts are shown to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how posts are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her audience decrease substantially.

The Process

• First, she modified her gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with comparable "agentic" language

The result was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my posts were softer - brief and insightful, but also warm and human," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after seven days, saying "Each day I persisted, and results improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some participants encountered positive results. One writer who modified both her gender to "man" and her race to "white" reported a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in particular situations or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to unofficial tests where the same posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and distribute content based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."